Recently in Use of Social Media in the Workplace and Policy Considerations Category

April 2, 2012

Invasion of Privacy or Good Hiring Practice? Use of Facebook and Social Media by Employers

Update: Facebook has responded to this controversy: It is warning employers not to demand passwords of job applicants and employees because it is an invasion of privacy. The Company's Chief Privacy Officer, tells applicants to never reveal their password to an employer.

socialmedia.jpegOur White Plains Employment Lawyers have been asked about whether employers should use social media in hiring decisions. Many employers have been reluctant to use Facebook or other social media sites to investigate prospective job applicants for fear of discrimination claims. For example, if an employer viewed and considered the contents of a candidate's Facebook page and then rejected the applicant, the company could face an employment discrimination claim. Specifically, the prospective employee could allege that Company learned information about him or her that it is could not use in the hiring process (e.g., applicant's race, age, gender, disability status, etc.). Despite the risk, some employers still prefer to view a candidate's online profile. In order to minimize legal exposure, companies will assign a HR employee who is separate from the hiring manager to review a candidate's online profile to verify it is consistent with the job application. Under this system, this HR employee does not speak with the hiring manager unless a red flag is detected such as a material misstatement in the employment application.

However, recently, many companies are taking a more aggressive approach towards social media and asking for employees to provide their personal passwords or allow access to private profiles on sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, to name just a few. Many applicants and employees believe that it is an invasion of privacy and have to balance a possible invasion of privacy versus possibly getting employment in a tough job market. Many Facebook users are creating two accounts, one for their personal use and one to provide to employers if asked. Employees have the right to refuse; however, private employers may have the right deny the employee employment or continued employment. Employers argue they have a legitimate need to view online profiles. For example, they may want to ensure that employees are not disparaging the company, its products or harassing other employees. In addition, studies have shown that a brief review of a candidate's online profile can be very useful in revealing more information than a personality test.

More than ever, it is imperative for companies to have a well-crafted social media policy. Our attorneys have helped many companies develop and implement policies depending on their companies' needs. These policies coupled with best practices can help many employers avoid costly litigation including claims of discrimination.

Illustration of an Organization Using Facebook: Last year, a corrections officer at Maryland's Department of Corrections ("DOC") complained to the ACLU that he was forced to provide his Facebook user name and password during an interview. The DOC wanted to make sure that they did not hire anyone affiliated with a gang. After the ACLU intervened, the DOC suspended the policy but came up with another one. Potential hires are now asked during their interviews to log into their Facebook accounts and allow the interviewer to watch the potential hire go through posts, friends, pictures and any other material that may be behind the privacy wall.

Of the 2,689 applicants it reviewed through social media, the Maryland DOC denied jobs to 7 of them because their sites contained pictures of them with gang signs. It also did offer jobs to 5 out of 80 employees hired in the last three hiring cycles who did not provide social media access. Access could be a double edged sword for employers.

Given the impact of social media's influence on individuals' lives as well as businesses, the use of social media in employment settings is evolving. Maryland and Illinois have proposed legislation that would make it illegal for employers to ask job applicants to provide passwords to their social media sites during job interviews. Perhaps other states will follow their lead. In the meantime, companies must be smart as to how they use social media. If you would like to discuss how your online profiles were used in your hiring situation, contact our Social Media Employment Law Attorneys at (800) 893-9645.


Continue reading "Invasion of Privacy or Good Hiring Practice? Use of Facebook and Social Media by Employers" »

December 9, 2010

Social Media Policies and Rules in the Workplace & Employee Discipline

images.jpegFAQ: Many of my employees and supervisors are on Facebook, LinkedIn and other social media sites and have been posting work-related comments in violation of my company's social media policy, which prohibits employees from posting anything about the company. Can I fire or discipline an employee for violating the policy?

Your question raises an important and timely subject for employers as well as employees that our Social Media Employment Law Attorneys have been encountering lately. The proper use of social media sites by companies and its employees can have a significant positive impact. In today's technological age with dozens of social media sites, employers should consider the benefits and risks of appropriate uses of social media before crafting their employee policies to maximize the value while limiting the risks. Simply having a policy is not enough, companies should train their employees on the legal and company considerations.

A recent case underscores the importance of having an effective social media policy. The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") filed a complaint on behalf of Dawn-Marie Souza, an emergency medical technician, against her former employer, the American Medical Response of Connecticut ("AMR"), for firing her for violating its company's Internet policy by criticizing her supervisor on Facebook. According to the complaint, Souza was denied union representation after her supervisor asked her to prepare an investigative report regarding a customer complaint about her job performance. Later the same day, she posted disparaging remarks about her boss on her Facebook page and then exchanged negative comments about him with other employees. AMR responded that Souza was fired because of complaints about her work and not because she violated company policy prohibiting employees from making any negative remarks about their bosses or discussing the company on the Internet.

However, the NLRB claims that Souza was illegally fired and that her comments on Facebook are protected speech under federal law. The NLRB's acting general counsel has stated that "[i]t's the same as talking at the water cooler" and that "employees have protection under the law to talk to each other about conditions at work." According to federal law, both union and non-union workers have the right to talk to co-workers and make remarks about their employers on their own time.

An NLRB judge will hear this case on January 25, 2011. Given the controversial nature of this issue and the far reaching implications, the outcome could affect employers nationwide, especially employers who have a broad policy prohibiting any comments on the Internet. If you have a blanket social media policy, consult with your attorneys to ensure that you are not infringing on any of your employee's rights or labor laws. In a survey by the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics, approximately 25% of employers surveyed stated that they had disciplined an employee for improper activities on social networking sites.

Continue reading "Social Media Policies and Rules in the Workplace & Employee Discipline" »